What should be the result of a well-conducted review process?

A well-conducted review process is designed to identify areas for improvement and ensure that the quality of the project is maintained throughout its lifecycle. The result of such a process should include clear action items for improvements. This means that participants in the review can pinpoint specific issues or enhancements needed, which can then be addressed effectively.

Effective reviews provide structured feedback that enhances the quality of the work being assessed. This feedback leads to tangible steps that can be taken to rectify any identified issues, improve processes, or enhance the final product. Thus, having clear action items allows teams to focus on precise areas that require attention, fostering a culture of continuous improvement.

While there may still be revisions needed after coding, and documentation practices may change based on the team’s methodology, the primary goal of a well-conducted review is to create actionable insights. Additionally, while it's ideal to minimize risks, it may not be realistic to eliminate all project risks entirely; instead, reviews help manage and mitigate them.