Which technique is commonly used for conducting a review process?

The review process focuses on evaluating work products, particularly code, for quality improvement, defect identification, and adherence to standards. Code inspection is a structured process that involves a detailed examination of the code or software documentation by a team of reviewers. The goal is to identify defects before the product moves to the next phase of development or reaches production. Inspections typically follow a defined procedure that includes preparation, a meeting to discuss findings, and the documentation of issues discovered.

This technique involves diverse perspectives since multiple reviewers, who may have different expertise and experiences, contribute to analyzing the code. Their collective insights lead to more thorough reviews, resulting in improved software quality. Code inspections also emphasize the importance of rigorous evaluation, which contrasts with other techniques that might not provide the same level of detailed scrutiny and formalized feedback loops.

In contrast, unit testing focuses on testing individual components for correctness rather than conducting a review process. Pair programming involves two developers working together at one workstation but is more about collaboration in code writing than formal reviewing. Static code analysis utilizes tools to evaluate code against specific rules but does not involve human reviewers discussing and deliberating on the findings, which is a key component of the inspection process.